2006 National Judicial Examination Study Guide: Three Major Litigation Laws - Comparative Analysis, 19 Lectures

Author: Legal Examination Center / Beijing Zhongtian Training School
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2006-03-10
Features: The Writing Style and Characteristics of This Book
This book is co-authored by several litigation law teachers with rich experience in legal examination teaching. The book is divided into three sections: Civil Procedure Law and Arbitration Law, Criminal Procedure Law, and Administrative Procedure Law. Each section is a culmination of the editors' long-term experience and repeated verification and research on the patterns of their professional studies in the legal examination. This ensures that each litigation law section comprehensively covers key points, has a systematic and clear structure, highlights key areas, and provides well-chosen examples and intuitive, accurate, and vivid charts.
The basis for writing this book is whether the legal examination might cover certain topics. It systematically compares the comparable parts of the three major litigation laws, resulting in 19 chapters. The first 15 chapters compare the knowledge modules of the three major litigation laws, while the last 4 chapters introduce key points and local comparisons of the interrelated parts and unique content of the three major litigation laws, aiming to help candidates comprehensively, completely, and macroscopically master the key points of the three major litigation laws, while also strengthening their understanding and memory of specific knowledge points.
Each chapter is divided into four parts: Overview, Basic Comparison Points, Example Exercises, and Related Statutory Comparisons. The Overview section provides a summary of the key points of each litigation law in that section and highlights the key points, avoiding equal effort by candidates on the same comparison points across different litigation laws. This is because the legal examination may have different emphases in the questions on different litigation laws. Key points frequently tested in Civil Procedure Law may be the key sections in the basic comparison points of other litigation laws. In the form of charts, they intuitively and hierarchically analyze, summarize, and compare the systems shared by the three major litigation laws or even just the key points within a single litigation law, enhancing candidates' ability to integrate and systematize knowledge, conducting meticulous review, and preventing superficial, hasty, and misleading study.
It is particularly noted that the comparison points are refined to specific questions, listing the small key points that should be compared, those that have already been or are likely to be tested. This allows candidates to clearly understand the number of key points, the number of identical and different knowledge points under the same comparison point, breaking through the previous situation of rough and fragmented content in similar supplementary books, without key comparisons and question hints, and thus disconnected from the direction of the questions.
The Example Exercises select some recent legal examination questions and predicted questions, especially those repeatedly tested and those likely to appear in the 2006 cycle. The number of examples is arranged according to the attention of the legal examination, the frequency of testing, and includes rare questions that may appear in 2006.
The Related Statutory Comparisons list the original texts of the key statutes mentioned in the basic comparison points, excluding statutes that have expired and including new statutes, striving for detailed comparisons while avoiding comprehensiveness. Statutes not tested are not included, and statutes related to key, difficult, or ambiguous points in the examination are listed in detail.