2006 National Master's Entrance Examination Tutoring Course · Mathematics Volume (Economic Category)

Author: Editorial Committee of the National Master's Entrance Examination Tutoring Course
Publisher:
Publishing Date: 2005-05-01
Features: Latest authoritative information from Peking University, Tsinghua University, and Renmin University of China; Led by the former head of the original question-setting group, with in-depth review by over 20 frontline experts, this 2006 graduate entrance exam solution is meticulously crafted; With question-type training as the core, it clearly explains problem-solving strategies and comprehensively showcases question variations; Explicitly reveals the principles and patterns of question-setting, capturing the pulse of graduate entrance exam questions. To better assist candidates in their preparation, we have dedicatedly compiled this "2006 National Master's Entrance Examination Tutoring Course · Mathematics Volume" based on the "Exam Syllabus" formulated by the Ministry of Education of China, combined with an analysis of recent years' graduate politics exam papers.
Taking the National Master's Entrance Examination is the essential path for every university student to join the ranks of graduate studies and receive elite education. Unlike general exams, the graduate entrance exam is a national selection process for high-level, high-caliber talents, with a strong emphasis on selective admission. During the four or five years of university after the college entrance exam, the exams students typically take are primarily proficiency-oriented, designed to assess their level of competence. These include the College English Test Band 4 and 6 (CET-4/6), as well as TOEFL and GRE. These exams generally require candidates to meet a certain standard—passing is the primary goal. In contrast, the graduate entrance exam demands candidates to outperform one another, with only those who score higher being admitted. As a result, the difficulty of the graduate entrance exam is inevitably far greater than the aforementioned exams, because only by increasing the difficulty can the gaps between candidates of different levels be widened, enabling the nation to select outstanding talents more effectively.