Judicial Documents Selected by People's Courts (Sichuan 2001 Volume, Total Third Volume)

Author: Sichuan High People's Court
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2002-04-01
Features: With the deepening of judicial reform, the disclosure of court judgments has been included as one of the contents of judicial openness. This initiative helps improve the quality of judgment documents, facilitates public access and supervision, and also has positive significance for improving legislation, enhancing judicial practices, and advancing legal teaching and research. As a bridge between courts and readers, we have collaborated with courts across various regions to edit and publish the serial publication Selected Judgments of People's Courts. This series is edited by the High People's Courts of provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government and is published in chronological order. Starting from 2000, volumes are published annually or biannually, divided by province, autonomous region, or municipality. The series includes judgment documents, ruling documents, and mediation documents created by the High People's Courts of provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities, as well as selected intermediate or grassroots courts. The content is characterized by typical case types, clear and concise case descriptions, relatively accurate determination of facts and application of law, and instructional value. The editorial format of the series is as follows:
1. Judgment documents are divided into criminal, civil (including economic, intellectual property, etc.), administrative, and state compensation categories. Each category is further subdivided into several types: criminal cases are arranged according to the order of the Criminal Code of the People's Republic of China; civil cases are arranged according to the classification order of the Provisional Regulations on the Classification of Civil Cases issued by the Supreme People's Court in October 2000; administrative cases are arranged in a departmental order that also considers content; state compensation cases are divided into administrative compensation and judicial compensation.
2. Within the same category of cases, ruling documents are listed before judgment documents, and cases are arranged in chronological order.
3. For the same case, judgment documents from higher courts are listed before those from lower courts.
We have made our initial attempt to edit such a large-scale series. Any shortcomings are welcome to be addressed by readers with valuable suggestions and opinions.