Judicial Documents Selected by People's Courts (Volume of Jiangxi 2001, First Total Volume)

Author: Jiangxi High People's Court Press
Publisher:
Publishing Date: 2003-10-01
Features: With the deepening of judicial reform, the disclosure of court judgments has become one of the key aspects of judicial openness. This initiative helps improve the quality of judgment documents, facilitates public access and supervision, and also has positive significance for improving legislation, refining judicial practices, and advancing legal teaching and research. As a bridge between the court and the public, we have collaborated with courts across various regions to edit and publish the serial publication Selected Judgments of the People's Courts. This series is edited by the higher people's courts of each province, autonomous region, and municipality directly under the Central Government, and is published in chronological order. The series began in 2000 and will be published annually or biannually by province, autonomous region, or municipality thereafter. The series includes judgment documents, ruling documents, and mediation documents created by higher people's courts and selected intermediate or primary people's courts across provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities. Its features include typical case types, clear and concise case descriptions, relatively accurate facts and legal applications, and instructional value. The editorial format of the series is as follows: 1. Judgment documents are divided into several categories: criminal, civil (including economic, intellectual property, etc.), administrative, and state compensation. Each category is further subdivided into several subcategories: criminal cases are arranged according to the order of the Criminal Code of the People's Republic of China; civil cases are arranged according to the classification order of the Provisional Regulations on the Classification of Civil Cases issued by the Supreme People's Court in October 2000; administrative cases are arranged in the order of departments while considering content; state compensation cases are divided into administrative compensation and judicial compensation. 2. Within the same category of cases, ruling documents are listed before judgment documents, and cases are arranged in chronological order. 3. For the same case, judgment documents from higher courts are listed before those from lower courts. For the first time, we have attempted to edit such a large-scale series. Any shortcomings are welcome to be brought to the attention of our readers with valuable suggestions and opinions.