Meaning, Truth, and Action (Essays on Pragmatism)

Author: Susan Haack (USA), Editor-in-Chief, Chen Bo, Deputy Editor-in-Chief Shang Xinjian
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2007-02-01
Features: Peirce and James rarely regarded pragmatism as a complete doctrine but more as a methodology. They hoped that the meaning criteria of pragmatism could both end endless and meaningless debates and provide a way to address legitimate philosophical issues. (Although pragmatism shares some similarities with later logical positivism in its focus on meaning criteria, unlike logical positivism, classical pragmatism is not anti-metaphysical in either its intentions or actual effects.) No single collection of essays can achieve complete fairness for a philosophical school as rich, complex, and full of competing or even contradictory ideas as pragmatism. However, the authors have included some essays that aim to reflect Peirce's notable contributions to logic, metaphysics, and the philosophy of science; James's contributions to the philosophy of psychology, philosophy of religion, metaphysics, and ethics; Dewey's contributions to political philosophy, philosophy of education, epistemology, and the philosophy of art; and Mead's foundational contributions to social psychology. — The authors hope this is sufficient to reflect the extraordinary scope and richness of pragmatism. Moreover, when selecting works by contemporary and modern proponents of pragmatism, the authors intentionally included pieces that reflect both the more conservative,ist wing and the more radical, revolutionary wing.