Legal Document Writing Guide - 2007 National Judicial Examination Preparation Guide (Legal Edition) (Revised Edition) (2007 National Judicial Examination Preparation Guide (Legal Edition) (Revised Edition))

Author: Liu Jie
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2006-12-01
Features: The judicial examination has now become one of the most difficult qualification exams in China. In the first judicial examination in 2002, 360,000 people applied, with a passing score line of 240 points, and 24,000 were admitted, with a pass rate of less than 7%. In 2003, nearly 200,000 people applied for the judicial examination, with the same passing score line of 240 points, but in some regions it was lowered to 225 points. Over 17,000 people met the passing criteria, with a pass rate of 8.75%. In 2004, the four exam papers were changed from 100 points to 150 points each, with a total score of 600 points. The papers increased the emphasis on theoretical assessment, making the difficulty slightly higher. In 2005, while maintaining the characteristics of 2004, the emphasis on legal theory was further increased. However, the 2006 judicial examination did not include questions on legal documents, which also suggests that the 2007 judicial examination may place greater emphasis on the ability to write legal documents. It can be said that to pass the judicial examination, one must not miss any opportunity to score points. Compared to other questions, writing legal documents is relatively easier to handle, easier to score, and has stable scores. In 2002 and 2003, legal document writing accounted for 11 points each, but in 2004, it was not tested. In 2005, legal document writing accounted for 25 points in the judicial examination. Although it was not tested in 2006, this type of question can best reflect the true level of a candidate's judicial practical ability, and the setters of the questions will not ignore this objective fact. Therefore, we predict that the points for legal document writing in future judicial examinations will remain relatively stable. Candidates should pay attention to legal document writing in the judicial examination and strive to score high marks. For this reason, we have decided to revise the Judicial Document Writing Guide for the fifth time. The revised book has the following features:
1. Representativeness. The book includes commonly used legal documents by courts, procuratorates, and lawyers, such as civil, criminal, and administrative judgments by courts (first and second instance), civil mediation documents, retrial judgments; prosecution documents, non-prosecution decisions, prosecution speeches, criminal appeals, procuratorial opinions by procuratorates; and legal documents commonly used by lawyers, such as complaints, criminal complaints, defense speeches, speeches, and replies.
2. Practicality. The book is written in five parts: the concept, format, writing method, examples, and precautions of legal documents, making it easy to understand, concise, highlighting examples, and focusing on the examination.
3. Comprehensiveness. To enable candidates to fully understand the examination of legal documents in previous legal exams and judicial examinations, we have specially included legal document questions from these exams since 1996, making the review more targeted. Due to limited ability, there may be omissions or inappropriate places in the book. We sincerely welcome criticism and corrections from readers. Finally, we wish all candidates success in passing the judicial examination!