Century Journey (A Hundred Years of Diplomatic in Seven Great Powers)

Author: (American) Pasternak, edited by Hu Liping, translated by Yang Yunqin
Publisher:
Publishing Date:
Features: Sovereign states, especially the UK, France, Germany, Russia, the US, Japan, and China, have consistently been the main players on the international stage throughout the 20th century. Predictions suggest that sovereign states may likely remain the main players in the next century. The best way to understand the next century is to learn how different countries shaped the contours of the 20th-century international system.
Excerpt: The resurgence of hegemonic ambitions. Like Emperor Wilhelm II, Hitler could not resist the temptation posed by Germany's strategic dilemma: eliminating the nightmare of "alliances with foreign powers" through all-out expansion. If Hitler had been a "normal" German leader, as the British appeasers initially believed, he would have expanded the achievements of Stresemann, further improving Germany's favorable strategic position. He would have continued to seek the abolition of the Treaty of Versailles' terms, reclaiming parts or all of the German territory dismantled in 1919, and perhaps once again securing Germany's role in overseeing the relationship between the East and West in Europe. But in Hitler's view, the European situation clearly favored Germany. The United States no longer belonged to either side of the balance of power. The Soviet Union was the same. It was happy to sit on the sidelines, watching the capitalist powers fight each other. France and Britain were at odds, and France was complacent about its Maginot Line. The French believed that building a concrete wall along the French-German border, equipped with cannons, would guarantee safety. Britain, until 1939, had been eager to appease "Hitler's" reasonable grievances. Hitler, of course, was not a revisionist who accepted the basic balance of power in Europe but a revolutionary trying to break it. Unlike Charles V or Napoleon I, Hitler was not a "normal" hegemonist. In 1939, he not only launched a world-power struggle but also waged a genocidal war against the "inferior races" in Europe, a phenomenon unprecedented in European history. Despite the unmatched madness of Hitler, one could still see the shadow of German strategic concepts that inspired figures like Moltke and Schlieffen in him. Less than a week before invading Poland in August 1939, Hitler privately revealed the truth: "Everything I do is aimed at the Soviet Union. If the West is foolish enough not to see this, I can only reach an understanding with the Russians first, defeat the West, and then fully turn my attention to the Soviet Union." Hitler did exactly that. On August 24, 1939, just a week before invading Poland, he signed the Non-Aggression Pact with the Soviet Union, securing their neutrality. In May 1940, Hitler invaded France and conquered the country in just six weeks. He then began bombing Britain, preparing for an invasion of the British Isles. In 1914, Moltke moved two crucial armies to the East Front before completely defeating France. Hitler did the same, launching an invasion of the Soviet Union in the summer of 1941 before the war in the West was over. Like the army of Emperor Wilhelm II, Hitler's army was caught in a two-front war. But this was where the similarities between Hitler and Wilhelm II ended. Hitler was different from Wilhelm II. It can be said that he was different from all the rulers of Europe since Charles V. He was not fighting a war but two wars: one for strategic hegemony and one for racial hegemony. He had to win the first war before launching the second, the industrialized genocide of the race. In May 1939, Hitler openly admitted: "Danzig is not the crux of the matter." The great powers still pursuing appeasement believed that Hitler merely wanted to overturn the territorial division clauses of the Treaty of Versailles. This referred to the German ceded territory of Danzig and East Prussia, but Hitler's true goal was to establish a European empire. German colonizers could gain Lebensraum in the conquered east as far as the Ural Mountains. By seizing African colonies on the periphery of the empire and establishing a naval fleet, the core of the empire would be protected. The Third Reich would then form a quadrilateral balance with the United States, the British Empire, and the Japanese Empire. In another generation, only two countries would compete for global hegemony: Germany and the United States. Hitler not only wanted to dominate Europe but ultimately the whole world. "Germany did not just want to seize territory; it also wanted to cleanse the Jewish, Polish, and other 'inferior races' living on that territory. The Jews of Europe had to be completely exterminated. After the war turned against Germany in 1942, genocide became the primary goal of Nazi fanaticism. Otherwise, why did Hitler continue to allocate his increasingly scarce resources—railway transport vehicles and military personnel—to gas chambers in the East rather than preventing the Red Army's advance? Why did Hitler order prisoners from Auschwitz and other concentration camps to walk to Germany in 1945, avoiding the approaching Russians and continuing the massacre in a safer place? Clearly, the goal of genocide was paramount, even above the very foundation of strategy—defending the homeland. Only after the Allies occupied every square inch of German territory did this dual war against the whole world and the Jews end. The catastrophic failure of Nazi Germany reveals the immense appetite of Nazi Germany. One of the first measures taken by the victorious powers of World War II was to abolish the entity that propelled Germany to great power status—the Prussian state—and erase its name. This was followed by the four-power occupation of Germany and then the division of Germany into seven parts. After waging a war that cost 55 million lives, Germany in 1945 faced only endless subjugation and punishment.