Meaning Expression Theory (Theory of Private Law Reasoning from the Perspective of Mental Science)

Author: Zhu Qingyu
Publisher:
Publishing Time: Not available
Features: Mr. Zhi Tang often used the concepts of "poetry expresses the will" and "literature carries the way" as the thread to narrate the history of Chinese literature. "Carrying the way" needs no further explanation. What Mr. Zhi Tang particularly emphasized was "expressing the will," advocating for the autonomy of literature, which stemmed from his admiration for Yuan Zhonglang's spirit of "writing with conviction and speaking freely, yet conforming to rules." Later scholars like myself also believe that if academic paths are standardized, no matter how grandly they are presented, they may not be the fortune of scholars. "Independent spirit and free thought" are indeed the soul of academia. Therefore, this series aspires to follow the footsteps of the great minds, dedicating itself to pursuing the character of freedom and independence in private law, contributing its modest efforts. Since this series upholds freedom and independence as its guiding principle, its purpose is not to engage in policy debates or rigid academic exercises, but to emphasize the expression of one's own spirit and the freedom from conventions. The standard for measuring the quality of articles is not external to academia but is determined by their intellectual contribution. Thus, what this series concerns itself with are the problem awareness, logical arguments, and intellectual contributions of the works. As for whether they elucidate the way or educate society, or whether they can govern the state and benefit the people, these are matters left undiscussed.
Academia is a public good. Although private law is a foreign import, the Chinese need not obsess over it, strictly adhering to the Great Barrier between the Chinese and foreigners or the distinction between form and function. I believe that while the world of life may differ, knowledge knows no boundaries. If we do not prioritize knowledge itself and instead artificially draw lines between nations, the so-called freedom and independence of private law may ultimately become as illusory as a mirror flower and water moon. Therefore, this series has no intention of carving out a "private law of our own" for the Chinese, but rather seeks to return to the source. Writing is not easy, and we sincerely hope that the wise in academia will not hesitate to offer their support. All theoretical works on private law that align with the series' purpose are warmly welcomed.
The publication of this series is made possible by the generous support of the China University of Political Science and Law Press. Their magnanimity and insight are deeply appreciated.