Author: Na Silu
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2004-08-01
Features: Historiography is not a science, and jurisprudence is not a science either, so contemporary legal historiography is not a science. This can be expressed in a syllogism: Historiography is not a science, jurisprudence is a branch of historiography, therefore legal historiography is not a science. It is precisely because legal historiography is not a science that it is more important. However, it must be noted that the research in legal historiography still must employ scientific methods. Taking judicial trials as an example, when a court conducts a judicial trial, it must first determine the truth of civil and criminal cases, that is, it must first discover the factual truth of the case, before applying the law. Legal historiography is concerned with the factual truth of cases. Only by employing scientific methods to correctly discover the factual truth of cases, and then correctly applying the law, can fair and just judicial trials be achieved.
Qing Dynasty Central Verdict System
📌 Related Posts
News
What are the adverse effects of mild hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in newborns?
2026-09-19
News
Which hospital is the best for precocious puberty
2026-09-20
News
When will my son's body temperature of 35.5 degrees Celsius return to normal?
2026-09-21
News
What should I do if the child's reaction is slow?
2026-09-22
Literature
Modern Management. Case Volume
2026-10-05
Literature
Comparative Study on the Community Governance Model between China and Canada - Taking Shanghai and Vancouver as Examples
2026-10-05
Literature
Negotiation and Persuasion
2026-10-05
Literature
Teamwork
2026-10-05