2007 National Master's Entrance Unified Examination History Exam Question Analysis by Famous Tutors on Political Chinese Theory

Author: Yu Xueben
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2006-02-01
Features: The past exam papers are the best simulation tests. Because history is a mirror. Understanding yesterday will help you understand today; mastering history and reality will enable you to steer the future. This series of books is characterized by complete materials, detailed analysis, thorough dissection, and flexible techniques. First, it compiles the past graduate entrance exam papers from 1996 to 2006 in English, 1999 to 2006 in Political Theory, and 1990 to 2006 in Mathematics, including Political Theory, English, Engineering Mathematics I, Engineering Mathematics II, Economic Mathematics III, and Economic Mathematics IV, totaling 6 volumes. Second, it truly achieves detailed analysis of each question, with thorough explanations and standardized solutions. It provides in-depth and meticulous analysis of the question-setting logic and the key and difficult points of solving problems, helping candidates grasp the patterns of solving problems, expand their analytical thinking, master problem-solving techniques, and significantly improve their exam performance, thereby achieving outstanding results in the 2007 graduate entrance exam. The unified graduate entrance exam has been around for nearly 20 years. From the analysis of the past 20 years' exam papers, it can be seen that there are certain patterns in the question-setting, and the questions also share many similarities. In fact, many questions in recent years are closely related to those in previous years.
English: In the Cloze Test section, after the basic usage of prepositions was tested in question 27 of 2004 and question 2 of 2005, the usage of prepositions was tested again in question 3 of 2006. At the same time, conjunctions remain a key focus in the Cloze Test. In 2004, there were 4 fill-in-the-blank questions with conjunctions: or, than, although, because. In 2005, there were 5 conjunction fill-in-the-blank questions: but, though, even if, whereas, also. In 2006, there were 4 conjunction fill-in-the-blank questions: although, even, while, and as. Even question 7 of 2006, question 1 of 2005, question 40 of 2004, and question 24 of 2003 and 2002 (question 31) tested the same conjunction although. Question 9 of 2005, question 27 of 2004, and question 7 of 2000 tested the same preposition for. Questions 36 of 2003 and 43 of 1996, 37 of 2003 and 34 of 1995, 26 of 2003 and 21 of 1995, 29 of 2003 and 42 of 1996, and 24 of 2003 and 42 of 1997 were very similar. Question 26 of 2002 and questions 37 of 1995 and 6 of 1999 tested the same preposition on. Question 8 of 2001 and question 9 of 1995 tested the same preposition by. Question 16 of 1999 and question 20 of 1994 tested the same preposition in. Question 4 of 2000 and questions 16, 20 of 2000, 8 of 1997, and 13 of 1995 tested the same preposition to. Question 1 of 2000 and question 2 of 1994 tested the same verb "appreciate" followed by a gerund form. Question 18 of 2000 and question 17 of 1997 tested the same conjunction that.
In the Writing section, the format of picture-based situational essays has remained unchanged in recent years. In 2003, the topic was the impact of family and social environment on personal growth. In 2004, the theme was the boundless pursuit of personal struggle. In 2005, the topic focused on respecting parents and creating a harmonious family. In 2006, the writing content focused on hot social topics and the widespread phenomenon of young people blindly chasing celebrities. This shows that the examiners' approach is to help individuals establish a correct social perspective, pay attention to their psychological growth, and emphasize the harmonious coexistence among family members and various social groups.
It is worth noting that in the Reading Comprehension section, the passages are vast, and the probability of repetition is almost zero. However, there are some key question types every year, such as detail questions, vocabulary and definition questions, reference questions, sentence comprehension questions, main idea questions, inference and extension questions, and logical judgment questions. Candidates should repeatedly think about and analyze these questions, thoroughly study the past exam papers, and deeply understand the examiners' logic to master the key to solving problems and be well-prepared for the exam.
The translation section also follows certain patterns. The past exam papers most frequently involve the translation of complex sentences, pronouns, verbs, abstract nouns, idiomatic expressions, and clauses.
Political Theory: Question 8 of 2006 was similar to question 21 of 2004, question 10 of 2006 to question 7 of 2002 (Science), question 11 of 2006 to question 11 of 2002 (Science), question 20 of 2006 to question 3 of 2004, question 23 of 2006 to question 18 of 2004, question 25 of 2006 to question 7 of 2004, question 29 of 2006 to question 13 of 2002 (Science), question 31 of 2006 to question 36 of 2004, question 5 of 2005 to question 19 of 2000 (Liberal Arts), question 7 of 2005 to question 26 of 2002 (Liberal Arts) and question 24 of 2000 (Science), question 8 of 2005 to question 21 of 2000 (Liberal Arts) and question 22 of 2000 (Science), question 11 of 2005 to question 8 of 1999 (Liberal Arts) and question 10 of 1999 (Science), question 18 of 2005 to question 4 of 1998 (Science), question 19 of 2005 to question 12 of 2003, question 23 of 2005 to question 32 of 1999 (Science), question 26 of 2005 to question 11 of 2000 (Liberal Arts) and question 15 of 2000 (Science), question 29 of 2005 to question 29 of 2004, question 2 of 2004 to question 36 of 2002 (Material Question Part 1), question 10 of 2004 to question 14 of 2003, question 12 of 2004 to question 26 of 2002 (Liberal Arts) and question 25 of 2003, question 19 of 2004 to question 14 of 1998 (Science) and question 21 of 2002 (Science), question 24 of 2004 to question 24 of 2002 (Science), and so on. The knowledge points tested in these questions are the same or very similar. If candidates fully digest and consolidate these past exam papers, they will lay a solid foundation for success in the graduate entrance exam.
For this reason, many students and teachers preparing for the graduate entrance exam urgently hope for a complete set of past exam papers as a reference to share these classic questions. The compilers have been working on collecting and organizing this material for many years. The series of books now published is believed to meet everyone's needs. This book is the crystallization of the research on graduate entrance exam question-setting by the compilers and experts, and it has extremely high authority. Among the authors of Political Theory, three were former heads of the Political Theory question-setting team or members of the team, one has long been involved in grading and has always served as the head of the Political Theory grading team, and one is a famous graduate entrance exam tutoring expert. The compiler of English is a graduate entrance exam tutoring expert and grading team expert. The compilers of Mathematics include Huang Xiankai, Cao Xianbing, Shi Mingcun, and Yin Xianjun, who are all renowned national graduate entrance exam tutoring experts. They are currently the main lecturers for large-scale graduate entrance exam tutoring classes and review sessions held in Beijing and other major cities across the country. Therefore, their analysis of past exam papers is highly authoritative and credible.