Patient's question:
Currently, in general situations: mild cervical erosion, what treatment is needed, and what reactions are there? Thank you.Doctor's answer:
How to Deal with Cervical ErosionCervical erosion is a common chronic inflammation of the cervix among women, with a higher incidence rate in women of childbearing age. Many women wonder, "I'm quite careful about hygiene, why did I get this condition?" In fact, having this disease does not necessarily result from poor hygiene. Cervical erosion can cause discomfort such as contact bleeding and increased secretions, affecting women's physical and mental health.
Recent research has shown that cervical erosion has a certain relationship with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, and HPV infection is associated with the occurrence of cervical cancer. Therefore, it is believed that cervical erosion should be actively treated.
Currently, the methods for treating cervical erosion are mostly vaginal use and physical methods. Vaginal use typically involves traditional Chinese medicine or a mixture of traditional Chinese medicine and antibiotics, which often have effects such as clearing heat, drying dampness, reducing swelling and pain, promoting blood circulation, and regenerating muscle. These methods are non-invasive, easy to use, and well-accepted by patients, especially suitable for mild cervical erosion. However, for moderate to severe cervical erosion, physical methods are still recommended for better efficacy.
Microwave treatment for cervical erosion utilizes the thermal effect of microwaves to cause protein coagulation in tissues, achieving the purposes of burning, coagulating, and hemostasis. Its clinical overall effective rate is 98.7%, and the healing surface is smooth, making it applicable to unmarried women without affecting their future fertility, with broad application prospects.
Comparison of Efficacy of Different Methods:
For both mild, moderate, and severe cervical erosion, when comparing vaginal use, laser treatment, and microwave treatment, the efficacy of the first two is close, but the overall effective rate of microwave treatment is significantly higher...