Spirit of Chinese Philosophy (Text and Image)

Author: Feng Youlan
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2005-05-01
Features: A country without philosophy is like a magnificent temple without idols—it is hollow and superficial, lacking something to believe in and something to respect. —(German) Hegel
The "Dao" discussed in this book is not the same as the "Dao" in New Logic. The "Dao" in this book explains the "Dao" in New Logic. The "Dao" in New Logic is philosophy. This book discusses the "Dao" in New Logic, so it is not a book about philosophy, but rather a book that discusses philosophy. The purpose of writing this book is to describe the development of the mainstream of Chinese philosophy, criticize its strengths and weaknesses, and reveal the position of New Logic in Chinese philosophy. Therefore, it first discusses the old school and then introduces the new tradition. When the similarities and differences are clear, the path of continuation becomes evident. Perhaps then, people will understand that the reason New Logic is called "new" is not merely for show. In recent years, there have been new interpretations of the old school, and this book has been used to spread these ideas to the present day. Thus, this book is not only a companion to New Logic, but also a supplement to the earlier work A History of Chinese Philosophy. The book consists of ten chapters, with one dedicated to the new tradition. Though I cherish it as a precious work, I may be criticized for it. However, Confucius said: "Even after King Wen passed away, was not the literature not found in me?" And Mencius said: "If the sages were to return, they would surely follow my words." With such confidence, even Laozi's followers, who were gentle and humble, said: "Those who know me are rare, and those who value me are precious." How high they set their own expectations! The way of learning is to each their own insights. To stand up for what is right is natural. When writing this book, I often discussed it with Mr. Shen Gongwu Ding. I also thanks Mr. Tang Xiyu Yongtong, Mr. He Zizhao Lin for reviewing the manuscript and providing corrections.