Crack the Inspiration Code

Author: Jiang Huichuan
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2005-06-01
Features: Inspiration is the product of the subject's consciousness and emotional activities. Consciousness plays a huge guiding role in inspirational thinking. Emotion is the driving force that inspires. Feich function · Black hole singularity — Spontaneous inspiration of consciousness Spontaneous inspiration belongs to non-random inspiration. Without self-awareness consciously regulating it, without perception, thinking, association, or imagination, it spontaneously and suddenly appears. French scientist Henri Poincaré (1854—1912) was seeking to solve the Feich function when he pondered deeply and exhausted all methods but failed. Feeling helpless, he had to temporarily set it aside and pursue other research. Later, he went on a field trip and made an unexpected discovery. He wrote: "I left my former residence in Caen. Continuing the geological academic survey organized by the Mining School, I made this trip, which made me forget my mathematical research. Upon arriving in K?nigsberg, we were about to take a public bus to another place. At the very moment my foot stepped onto the stairs, unrelated to my previous thoughts, I suddenly had a realization: the transformation I used to define the Feich function was exactly the same as the transformation in non-Euclidean geometry. I did not verify this idea. Sitting in the bus, I continued the conversation I had started earlier, as there was no time to verify it, but I felt very certain. On my return journey to Caen, I took advantage of my free time to verify it." When Poincaré had this inspiration, it was not just the moment he stepped onto the stairs, but he was completely thinking about something else, and the conversation was also completely unrelated to the Feich function. Yet it spontaneously appeared without any reason! British contemporary mathematician and physicist Roger Penrose, while studying cosmology in 1964, also experienced a similar situation. At that time, he had been troubled by the black hole singularity problem. When a star evolves to the late stage and becomes a neutron star, if this star has a large mass, such as 10 or 100 times that of the Sun, its gravity is immense, capable of pulling in everything nearby, even light. Since the speed of light is a limiting speed, nothing can escape. Therefore, no matter what can escape, nothing can escape. Such a space-time region of a neutron star is a black hole. Oppenheimer and Snyder pointed out in 1936 that the complete spherical collapse of a massive star would lead to a space-time singularity at the center. The classical theory of general relativity fails at this point. If all the collapsing matter concentrates at this central point, the density of the singularity would be infinite. If the collapse is not perfectly spherical symmetric, the matter reaches the central region in a chaotic manner, and an infinite density may not be produced, perhaps the matter could rotate back out. In the early 1960s, quasars were discovered. Some speculated that the center of a quasar might be something similar to a black hole. Others believed that Oppenheimer and Snyder's spherical symmetric assumption might have provided a completely misleading image. Penrose also developed an interest in studying black holes. He thought that according to general relativity, there might be an unproven mathematical theorem that could prove the inevitability of space-time singularities and thus prove that the image of black holes must be correct. As long as the collapse reaches a condition similar to "no return point."