Civil Court Judgments Selection [Zhejiang 2002 Volume · Volume 5]

Author: Zhejiang High People's Court
Publisher:
Publishing Date: 2005-03-01
Features: With the deepening of judicial reform, the disclosure of court judgments has become one of the key aspects of judicial openness. This initiative helps improve the quality of judgment documents, facilitates public access and supervision, and has positive implications for legislative improvement, judicial advancement, and the promotion of legal teaching and research. As a bridge between courts and readers, we have collaborated with courts across various regions to compile and publish the serial publication Selected Court Judgments of the People's Courts. This series is edited by the high courts of provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government and is published in chronological order. Starting from 2000, one to two volumes are published each year, organized by province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government. The series includes judgment documents, ruling documents, and mediation documents produced by high courts and selected intermediate or primary courts across provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government. Its features include typical case types, clear and concise case descriptions, relatively accurate facts and legal applications, and instructional value. The editorial format of the series is as follows: 1. Judgment documents are divided into criminal, civil (including economic, intellectual property, etc.), administrative, and state compensation categories, each further subdivided into several types: Criminal cases are arranged according to the order of the Criminal Code of the People's Republic of China; civil cases are arranged according to the classification order of the Provisional Regulations on the Classification of Civil Cases issued by the Supreme People's Court in October 2000; administrative cases are arranged in a departmental and content-based order; state compensation cases are divided into administrative compensation and judicial compensation. 2. Within the same category of cases, ruling documents are listed before judgment documents, followed by the chronological order. 3. For the same case, judgment documents from higher courts are listed before those from lower courts. This is our first attempt at compiling such a large-scale series. Any shortcomings are welcome to be addressed by our readers with valuable suggestions and opinions.