Construct a Technology Group Creativity Evaluation Model

Author: Fu Shixia
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2005-04-01
Features: Based on the paradigm of creative psychology, this book examines the topic from a micro perspective, focusing on relatively small and closely organized research teams. It emphasizes the interactive relationships among internal psychological factors, group organizational factors, and especially the group environment atmosphere, revealing the multi-factor structure and dynamic mechanisms of creative competence in scientific and technological groups. Furthermore, it constructs an exploratory conceptual model to describe the creative competence of scientific and technological groups.
Through modeling, this book conducts in-depth exploration and analysis of group creativity, group cognitive styles, the composition mechanisms and functions of group creative atmosphere in theory. In terms of empirical research, it employs psychological methods such as creativity tests and in-depth interviews to conduct large-sample surveys and utilizes advanced statistical software for refined statistical analysis of the collected data.
Since the late 20th century, the integration of science and technology with the economy, society, and the globalization of economic and technological competition, as well as the informatization and networking of scientific and technological and artistic exchanges, have become increasingly prominent. Against this backdrop, as the phenomenon of achieving scientific and technological creativity in group form gains worldwide attention, research on group creativity in creative psychology has also emerged as a new direction with broad prospects.
If assessing individual creativity is primarily driven by the needs of implementing creative education, developing people's creative potential, and cultivating creative talents; then assessing the creative competence of scientific and technological groups is even more important for enhancing scientific and technological competitiveness by strengthening scientific research management and improving the scientificity of research management.
Our research on constructing an assessment model for the creative competence of scientific and technological groups and the achievements obtained not only hold practical significance for the understanding of the regularities of group creativity, as well as the disciplinary or theoretical development of management science and creative studies, but more importantly, they provide an operational indicator system and theoretical tools for decision-makers in various levels of scientific research management in our country. These tools can be used to predict and evaluate the creative competence of scientific and technological groups, thereby enhancing the scientificity of research decision-making and management.