Common Error Classification and Detailed Explanation

Author: Beijing Wanguo School
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2005-03-01
Features:
- Experienced Tutors: Accurately identify common mistakes;
- Classification and Summarization: Concentrate on overcoming preparation blind spots;
- In-depth Explanations: Rapidly improve problem-solving skills.
Everyone's knowledge is limited. As people gain more knowledge, their exposure to the unknown world increases, and they discover more of their own ignorance. In other words, the richer the knowledge, it does not mean fewer problems, but rather more problems being discovered. Therefore, it is not scary to find more problems—it indicates progress and forward movement! Learning is an ongoing process of raising questions, discovering problems, and continuously solving them. If one cannot identify or raise questions during learning, it will be terrible! The inability to raise or identify questions means one has not thought deeply in learning and has not truly internalized external knowledge as part of their own knowledge system. Learning is a self-reflective process, the process of "internalizing" external knowledge into a part of one's intrinsic knowledge system. For the judicial examination review, if these problems are not raised and solved during the review, they are likely to manifest in the actual judicial examination. At that time, it will be fatal! To avoid such a fatal situation, we must pay attention to reflection during review and develop the habit of raising questions.
Beijing Wanguo School encourages students to discover and raise problems during judicial examination training and provides comprehensive services to answer and resolve their queries. In the process of providing these services, we found that although the learning questions raised by students are diverse, some questions have strong typical significance. These typical questions are not raised by a small number of students but are common issues; they are not unique to a specific year or training phase but are problems raised by students across all years and training phases. Therefore, we believe it is necessary to compile these typical questions and present them to judicial examination reviewers. The book in hand is our effort. During the compilation of this book, we strive to achieve the following points:
First, the questions are almost entirely from students, either from the judicial examination forum on Beijing Wanguo School's website, questions submitted by face-to-face class students, or letters from correspondence students, etc.
Second, the selection of questions is highly typical. These are questions that judicial examination reviewers generally raise. For example, in the field of administrative law, the principle of "once for all" in administrative penalties, cases requiring pre-reconsideration, etc.
Third, the answers to the questions are also highly targeted, highlighting the key points where the questioners have doubts.
Fourth, in the organization of the questions, we roughly follow the knowledge system of each departmental law, making it easier for readers to find and summarize.