Judicial Documents of People's Courts (Volume 2 of Guizhou 2001, Total Second Volume)

Author: Compiled by the Guizhou High People's Court
Publisher:
Publishing Date: 2003-12-01
Features: With the deepening of judicial reform, the disclosure of court judgments has been included as part of the openness of judicial proceedings. This initiative helps improve the quality of judgment documents, facilitates public access and supervision, and also has positive significance for improving legislation, enhancing judicial practices, and advancing legal education and research. As a bridge between courts and readers, we have collaborated with courts across various regions to compile and publish the serial publication Selected Court Judgments of the People's Courts. This series is edited by the higher people's courts of each province, autonomous region, and municipality directly under the Central Government, and is published in chronological order. Starting from 2000, one to two volumes are published each year, divided by province, autonomous region, or municipality. The series includes judgment documents, ruling documents, and mediation documents prepared by higher people's courts and selected intermediate or primary courts across provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities. Its features include typical case types, clear and concise case descriptions, relatively accurate facts and legal applications, and instructional value. The editorial format of the series is as follows: 1. Judgment documents are divided into criminal, civil (including economic, intellectual property, etc.), administrative, and state compensation categories. Each category is further divided into subcategories: criminal cases are arranged according to the order of the Criminal Code of the People's Republic of China; civil cases are arranged according to the classification order of the Provisional Regulations on the Classification of Civil Cases issued by the Supreme People's Court in October 2000; administrative cases are arranged by department while also considering content; state compensation cases are divided into administrative compensation and judicial compensation. 2. Within the same category of cases, ruling documents are listed before judgment documents, and cases are arranged in chronological order. 3. For the same case, judgment documents from higher courts are listed before those from lower courts. For the first time, we have attempted to compile such a large-scale series. Any shortcomings are welcome to be addressed by readers with valuable suggestions and opinions.