2007-Analysis and Training of Historical Questions and Answers from the National Judicial Examination

Author: Zhang Ling
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2007-01-01
Features: This book has the following distinctive features:
(1) Revealing the patterns of questions, strengthening the focus of assessment, and providing review tips.
The book is divided into three parts. The first part covers the score distribution, assessment characteristics, key points summary, and review tips for each department of law. Based on the true questions from 2002 to 2006, this part conducts precise statistical analysis of the judicial examination true questions over five consecutive years, grouped by department of law, to reveal the patterns of question setting, strengthen the focus of assessment, and provide review tips.
Score Distribution: In the form of charts and tables, it summarizes the scores of each department of law over the past five years in the examination and their proportion in the total score. This allows readers to gain an overall understanding of the score distribution of each department of law before studying the true questions, helping them identify the key points and focus of review from a macro perspective.
Assessment Characteristics: From the perspective of review and examination, it introduces the specific assessment patterns of each department of law over the past five years, revealing the fundamental and unchanging patterns, and analyzing the dynamic adjustments. By examining the patterns of question setting, it analyzes the development trends of true questions in each department of law.
Key Points Summary: In the form of charts and tables, it lists the detailed assessment direction, knowledge points, and scores of each knowledge point for each department of law over the past five years, summarizing the patterns of question setting and score distribution for specific knowledge points.
Review Tips: Based on the systematic analysis above, it provides practical review suggestions for preparing for the 2007 judicial examination, tailored to the assessment characteristics of each department of law over the past five years.
(2) Full and authentic arrangement of questions, with high-intensity and large-volume training.
The second part is a collection of true questions from previous years. This part arranges the true questions from 2002 to 2006, which are close to the characteristics of the next year's examination, in chronological order from recent to past. The structure of the questions maintains the basic format of the original examination papers. The selection of questions is appropriate, facilitating high-intensity and large-volume training during university review.
(3) Rigorous and accurate answers, in-depth and thorough explanations, cultivating the mindset of analyzing true questions.
The third part is the answers and explanations for the questions. The answers to every question in this book are strictly derived from current legal provisions and established legal theories, ensuring accuracy and uniqueness. For answers that have been identified as problematic since 2003, as announced by authorized authorities, this book provides an analysis in the answer and explanation section, raises objections, and offers sufficient arguments for the objections, along with complete and rigorous explanations of the correct answers.
In the process of explanation, the book strengthens the clarification of major distractors and enhances the legal arguments, ensuring that candidates not only know the "what" but also understand the "why." At the same time, to improve, the book also strengthens the comparison and differentiation of frequently tested knowledge points from multiple perspectives, such as horizontal and vertical analysis, to deeply reinforce key points and thoroughly break through difficulties and doubts.