2007 Judicial Examination Key Legal Provisions Supplementary Golden Questions - (Full 5 Volumes) (Legal Edition)

Author: None
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2007-01-01
Features: How can the Judicial Examination no longer be a riddle for you? Proper practice is necessary. What to practice? The Judicial Examination is essentially about testing the understanding and application of legal provisions, known as "judging according to facts and applying the law as the criterion." When solving problems, it is first necessary to grasp the legal criterion and then apply it to cases (examples). Therefore, there are two types of practice: one is legal provisions, which involves practicing the mastery of the legal criterion; the other is cases, which involves practicing the application of the legal criterion to specific examples. Which is more fundamental—practicing law or practicing cases? Of course, it is more fundamental to practice law through practice. Because familiarity with the law is the foundation for correctly solving cases. Without a legal criterion in mind, it is impossible to correctly apply the law to resolve cases. Which is more effective—practicing law or practicing cases? Of course, it is more effective to practice law through practice. Because legal provisions are limited, and through a certain amount of practice, they can be mastered. However, specific cases are infinite and ever-changing, making it impossible to exhaust them even through practice. Therefore, practicing a deep understanding and mastery of the law itself is a "constant adaptation to change" solution. I have seen some candidates who are enthusiastic about collecting and studying various difficult cases, even going to great lengths to find definitive answers. Such a spirit is indeed valuable, but it is not the right approach for legal exams. Because the world is vast and full of wonders, even one answer is just a case-by-case solution with no universal guiding significance. There are also some candidates who know nothing about relevant laws, regulations, or judicial interpretations and plunge into the analysis of various cases, ultimately failing to form a correct and systematic knowledge. For these candidates, it may be necessary to step back, first master the law, and then consider practicing cases. And when practicing cases, it should also revolve around the familiarity and understanding of legal provisions. With a solid foundation, it is appropriate to moderately train adaptability. Look at past exam papers. There are numerous questions that test the memory and understanding of legal provisions. Solving such questions is highly effective with a familiar grasp of the law. There are also some questions that can be answered simply with a basic understanding of the legal provisions. Of course, there are also some difficult cases that cannot be solved merely by rote memorization of legal provisions. In this regard, my suggestion is to prepare for relatively simple and reliable materials. What is simple and reliable? It is the familiarity with legal provisions and the mastery of their basic application. This way, you can answer about 60% of the questions on the exam. The remaining difficult problems can be left to chance. Only in this way can you truly pass the Judicial Examination not relying on luck. This book follows this approach: first, it adapts legal provisions into exercises to help familiarize and understand their content. Then, it creates case (example) exercises to practice the understanding and application of legal provisions. Legal provisions are limited, and the more you practice, the more solid your understanding becomes. Cases, however, are endless, and it is advisable to practice them in moderation.