Financial statement fraud (Prevention and Detection)

Author: Rezaei/Zhu Guohong
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2005-12-01
Features: Since the Enron scandal, financial statement fraud has become a focal point for the U.S. investment public, government, and regulatory authorities. This book is a masterpiece introduced under this backdrop. The authors first define financial statement fraud as a crime, then break away from the traditional conventions of accounting discourse and place financial statement fraud within the corporate governance system composed of the board of directors, audit committee, senior management team, internal auditors, external auditors, and regulatory agencies. They argue that strengthening corporate governance is the fundamental way to prevent, detect, and correct financial statement fraud. The book meticulously and rigorously analyzes the roles and behaviors of each component of the corporate governance system in preventing and detecting financial statement fraud. Its examination of the prevention, detection, and correction of financial statement fraud in the digital economy environment is particularly engaging. The discussion on the benefits, challenges, and costs of the Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) is also captivating. Furthermore, the exploration of fraud examination practices and educational issues strikes at the core of the current issues. By incorporating well-known public companies and skillfully integrating them with the guidelines of standard-setting institutions such as the AICPA and SEC, the book provides theoretical and practical advice for management and auditors. All key topics are thoroughly analyzed in this book. The theory is innovative, and the content is highly reference-worthy, making it an ideal read for corporate executives, independent directors, social intermediaries, academic professionals, financial statement users, MPAcc, MBA, and EMBA students.
[Preface] At the dawn of the new century, financial statement fraud has increasingly become a serious issue of concern for businesses, governments, and investors. In fact, the threat posed by this issue has damaged confidence in capital markets, corporate leaders, and even the respected auditing profession. More notably, auditors have suffered a heavy blow due to the perception that they are unable to detect significant fraud. Billions of dollars in penalties for CPA firms have become commonplace. Many who know about auditing procedures say that the auditing methods we have known for the past 75 years have come to an end. But that is not the whole of the bad news. The reason is that if an audit cannot detect these massive crimes, what is the benefit of placing it at the top of our public companies? In 1984, when the U.S. Supreme Court declared that independent auditors were essentially the public's "watchdog," it also acknowledged the premise implied by this statement. However, in the 20 years following this declaration, we have seen too many "watchdogs" sleeping, toothless, or too old to chase prey. Moreover, over the past 30 years, the largest CPA firms have been undergoing a pattern of transformation: they no longer earn the majority of their money from traditional auditing services but rather from selling and providing products to every client they audit. In short, critics say, the "watchdog" is too close to the people it can see.