Xinfengnian Music Notes

Author: Xin Fengnian
Publisher:
Publish Date: 1999-04-01
Features: Since ancient times, the Chinese have enjoyed appreciating poetry, calligraphy, and painting. The highest rating is "divine," followed by "excellent," and then "competent." Some works fall between divine and excellent, termed "refined." Should the same be done for famous musical compositions? It should be said that truly divine works are not very common. Otherwise, this "grand prize" status would lose its value. Works of excellent quality are quite numerous. Many so-called famous compositions might be better categorized as competent. There are also some that may not even meet the standard of competence. Clearly, divine, refined, and excellent works should be listed as "essential listening." Competent works are "optional listening." However, problems must be considered from multiple angles. If all top-tier works are classified as essential listening, ordinary enthusiasts may lack both the time and expertise. Bach's St Matthew Passion and Beethoven's Piano Sonata No. 106 are two such examples that one might have to reluctantly omit. On the other hand, some works, though not divine, are still essential listening. They help form an understanding of the development of musical history and provide a contrast, thereby highlighting the characteristics of the divine works. For instance, listening to the works of Vivaldi and Scarlatti enriches one's concept of Baroque music, while Bach and Handel's individual styles become more distinct. Essential listening should be kept to a minimum to allow for in-depth study, while optional listening can be more extensive, allowing for broader exploration. Deep study and extensive reading complement each other and are equally indispensable.