2007 National Postgraduate Entrance Examination. Analysis of Past Exam Papers by Renowned Experts (English)

Author: Yuan Xixing et al.
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2006-03-01
Features:the best mock tests. Because, history is a mirror. Understanding yesterday will help you understand today; mastering history and reality will enable you to steer the future. This series of books is characterized by complete materials, detailed analysis, thorough dissection, and flexible techniques. First, it compiles the past graduate entrance examination papers from 1996 to 2006 in English, 1999 to 2006 in Political Theory, and 1990 to 2006 in Mathematics, including Political Theory, English, Engineering Mathematics I, Engineering Mathematics II, Economic Mathematics III, and Economic Mathematics IV, totaling 6 volumes. Second, it truly achieves detailed solutions for each question, with thorough analysis and standardized answers, providing in-depth and meticulous explanations of the question-setting logic and key and difficult points to help candidates grasp the problem-solving patterns, expand analytical thinking, master answering techniques, and significantly improve their exam performance, thereby achieving outstanding results in the 2007 graduate entrance examination. The unified graduate entrance examination has been nearly 20 years old. From the analysis and research of the past 20 years' questions, it can be seen that there are certain patterns in question-setting, and the questions also share many similarities. In fact, recent years' questions are quite related to those of previous years.
English: In the Cloze Test section, after the basic usage of prepositions was tested in question 27 of 2004 and question 2 of 2005, the usage of prepositions was tested again in question 3 of 2006. Meanwhile, conjunctions remain a key focus in the Cloze Test. In 2004, there were 4 fill-in-the-blank questions with conjunctive words: or, than, although, because. In 2005, there were 5 fill-in-the-blank questions with conjunctions: but, though, even if, whereas, also. In 2006, there were 4 fill-in-the-blank questions with conjunctions: although, even, while, and as. Even question 7 of 2006, question 1 of 2005, question 40 of 2004, and question 24 of 2003 and 31 of 2002 all tested the same conjunction although. Question 9 of 2005, question 27 of 2004, and question 7 of 2000 all tested the same preposition for. Questions 36 of 2003 and 43 of 1996, 37 of 2003 and 34 of 1995, 26 of 2003 and 21 of 1995, 29 of 2003 and 42 of 1996, and 24 of 2003 and 42 of 1997 were all very similar. Question 26 of 2002 and 37 of 1995 and 6 of 1999 tested the same preposition on. Question 8 of 2001 and 9 of 1995 tested the same preposition by. Question 16 of 1999 and 20 of 1994 tested the same preposition in. Question 4 of 2000 and 16, 20 of 2000, 8 of 1997, and 13 of 1995 all tested the same preposition to. Question 1 of 2000 and 2 of 1994 tested the same verb "appreciate" followed by a gerund form. Question 18 of 2000 and 17 of 1997 tested the same conjunction that.
In the Writing section, the format has remained consistent with picture-based situational essays in recent years. In 2003, the theme was the impact of family and social environment on personal growth. In 2004, the theme was the boundless pursuit of personal struggle. In 2005, the theme was filial piety and the creation of a harmonious family. In 2006, the focus was on hot social topics and the widespread phenomenon of youth blindly chasing celebrities. This shows that the examiners' approach is to help individuals establish a correct social perspective, pay attention to their psychological development, and emphasize the harmonious coexistence of family members and various social groups.
It is worth noting that in the Reading Comprehension section, the passages are vast, and the probability of repetition is almost zero. However, certain key question types are covered every year, such as detail questions, vocabulary and definition questions, reference questions, sentence comprehension questions, main idea questions, inference and extension questions, and logical judgment questions. Candidates should repeatedly think about and analyze these questions, thoroughly study past papers, and deeply understand the examiners' logic to master the key to solving problems and be well-prepared for the exam.
In the Translation section, there are also patterns to follow. Past questions most frequently involve the translation of complex sentences, pronouns, verbs, abstract nouns, idiomatic expressions, and clauses.
Political Theory: Question 8 of 2006 was similar to question 21 of 2004, question 10 of 2006 to question 7 of 2002 (Science), question 11 of 2006 to question 11 of 2002 (Science), question 20 of 2006 to question 3 of 2004, question 23 of 2006 to question 18 of 2004, question 25 of 2006 to question 7 of 2004, question 29 of 2006 to question 13 of 2002 (Science), question 31 of 2006 to question 36 of 2004, question 5 of 2005 to question 19 of 2000 (Arts), question 7 of 2005 to question 26 of 2002 (Arts) and question 24 of 2000 (Science), question 8 of 2005 to question 21 of 2000 (Arts) and question 22 of 2000 (Science), question 11 of 2005 to question 8 of 1999 (Arts) and question 10 of 1999 (Science), question 18 of 2005 to question 4 of 1998 (Science), question 19 of 2005 to question 12 of 2003, question 23 of 2005 to question 32 of 1999 (Science), question 26 of 2005 to question 11 of 2000 (Arts) and question 15 of 2000 (Science), question 29 of 2005 to question 29 of 2004, question 2 of 2004 to question 36 of 2002 (Material question, part 1), question 10 of 2004 to question 14 of 2003, question 12 of 2004 to question 26 of 2002 (Arts) and question 25 of 2003, question 19 of 2004 to question 14 of 1998 (Science) and question 21 of 2002 (Science), question 24 of 2004 to question 24 of 2002 (Science), and so on. The knowledge points tested in these past questions are the same or very similar. If candidates thoroughly digest and consolidate these past questions, they will lay a solid foundation for success in the graduate entrance examination.
For this reason, many students and teachers preparing for the exam urgently hope to have a complete set of past exam materials as a reference to share these classic questions. The compilers have been working on collecting and organizing this material for many years. The series of books now published is believed to meet everyone's needs. This book is the crystallization of the compilers' and experts' research on graduate entrance examination question-setting, and it has extremely high authority. Among the authors of Political Theory, three were former heads of the Ministry of Education's Political Theory question-setting team or members, one has long been in charge of grading and has always served as the head of the Political Theory grading team, one is a renowned exam preparation expert, and the compiler of English is an exam preparation expert and grading team expert. The compiler of Mathematics is Huang Xiankai, Cao Xianbing, Shi Mingcun, and Yin Xianjun, all of whom are nationally renowned exam preparation experts. They are now the main instructors for large-scale exam preparation classes and review sessions held in Beijing and other major cities across the country. Therefore, their analysis of past questions is highly authoritative and credible.