2006-Today's Law Talk-(3)

Author: Wang Xinzhong, He Shuwen / Country: Mainland China
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2006-06-01
Features: Exposes the coldness of society and the warmth of human relationships, recording the progress of China's legal system in detail. "Today's Legal Talk" – a highly popular legal program on China Central Television (CCTV) – selects legal cases from all over the country to analyze, allowing you to enrich your legal knowledge while enjoying exciting cases and equipping yourself with legal tools to protect yourself. This book is composed of four parts: "Journalist's Notes," "Case Selections," "Xiao Sa's Mailbox," and "Legal Archives." The case examples in the book are all based on the real lives of ordinary people. Combining cases with the analysis of CCTV hosts and lawyers, it tells us how to file a lawsuit, how to respond after being sued, and what to do if we lose the case. This book will give you a "Today's Legal Talk." "Today's Legal Talk" emphasizes "commonality," roots in "law," is light on "oddity," and values "inspiration." As a renowned legal program on CCTV, it has a well-defined value system (respecting the law, focusing on the rule of law, and respecting the public), strict selection standards (high legal content, strong storytelling, high visual appeal, and strict policy adherence), and a unique reporting structure (stories + authoritative studio commentary). Through the trials and expert reviews of specific cases, it takes the small to show the big, accumulates small insights, and fully demonstrates every progress and aspect of a legal society. The cases collected in "Today's Legal Talk" are all bizarre yet real legal cases. Here, it not only satisfies your curiosity but also helps you enrich your legal knowledge. "Today's Legal Talk" is a brand program on CCTV, hosted by the famous host Sa Beining. Here, you can fully appreciate Sa Beining's serious hosting style and rigorous language features. Miss Wu heard such a statement and immediately raised counterarguments. This advertisement started being published in March. If it was a layout error by the advertising company, why did Meilunmeihuan Plastic Surgery Clinic not notice it for so long? Miss Wu Min believes that if the clinic has not corrected the issue for so long, it should also bear responsibility. Moreover, she has a more compelling piece of evidence: a photo taken inside Meilunmeihuan Clinic, which clearly states that Wu Senlin is a physician at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. However, Meilunmeihuan Plastic Surgery Clinic has questioned this photo. The manager of Meilunmeihuan Plastic Surgery Clinic took the reporter to see the current introduction hanging in the clinic. It states that Wu Senlin was a disciple of a professor at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, meaning Wu Senlin once studied under a professor at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. However, the photo provided by Wu Min does not include the word "disciple." So, was it Miss Wu who tampered with the photo, or did Meilunmeihuan Plastic Surgery Clinic replace the introduction after the incident? The reporter learned from the Jiangbei District Administration for Industry and Commerce that when they received Miss Wu's complaint, they also investigated Meilunmeihuan Plastic Surgery Clinic and took photos as evidence. The photo shows Wu Senlin's introduction as: Wu Senlin, Deputy Chief Physician, Plastic Surgery Department, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. During the interview, the reporter learned that the photos taken by the Jiangbei District Administration for Industry and Commerce and the plaintiff Miss Wu are completely identical in content, and the photos are stamped with the official seal of the parties involved. After the presentation and examination of evidence, the first-instance court accepted the evidence of the plaintiff Miss Wu. In November 2005, the court issued a judgment in this case, ordering the defendant Meilunmeihuan Plastic Surgery Clinic to compensate the plaintiff Miss Wu with double the amount, totaling 30,000 yuan.
Expert Commentary
Host: The court still adopted the "Consumer Rights Protection Law." From the court's perspective, it feels that counterfeit behavior should be heavily cracked down on. However, for cases like this, the outcomes may vary depending on where they are tried and which judge is presiding. Zheng Xueqian: I just mentioned two different understandings. In the future, when issuing judicial interpretations to resolve medical disputes, there may be a clearer explanation for such issues.
P16