Patient's question:
Today, I saw in the newspaper that currently, both domestically and internationally, the treatment for cervical erosion is relatively favored by focused ultrasound therapy. It utilizes the good penetration of ultrasound and accurate positioning to focus on the cervix internally, destroying internal inflammatory cells, allowing normal tissue function to recover, promoting tissue reconstruction, shortening recovery time, and having a low recurrence rate. After treatment, it does not leave scars and has good elasticity, making it particularly suitable for those with fertility requirements.Is focused ultrasound therapy really that good compared to other physical therapies? Is the price very expensive? How much does it generally cost in hospitals? Thank you!
First follow-up question: I am unmarried and have not
Doctor's answer:
Hello: The cost is unclear! Some people believe that physical therapy methods (such as laser) for cervical erosion may lead to infertility, which is actually an incorrect viewpoint. Cervical erosion itself can cause infertility and definitely requires treatment. However, if the erosion is severe, using medication for treatment may be costly, time-consuming, and require a lot of effort (if the erosion is moderate to severe, clinical experience shows that treatment typically takes 2 to 3 months; some people with a good response may recover faster, while others may need more time). Therefore, for patients with severe cervical erosion who have not been able to conceive, it is recommended to use physical therapy methods such as laser. This approach is fast-acting, and during treatment, you should inform the doctor about your fertility needs so that the procedure can be performed more superficially, ensuring it does not affect the function of the cervix. Even in cases of cervical adhesion, it can be resolved with a simple procedure.