Author: Guo Ming
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2005-08-01
Features: In the existing legal knowledge system of China, the study of penology has not received the attention it deserves. As for the history of penology, it is even less discussed. This book covers almost all available materials on Chinese penology since the late Qing Dynasty. From this book, it can be seen that Professor Guo Ming's research on the history of penology is at the forefront in China. — Professor Chen Xingliang, Peking University Law School
Within the scope of law I have encountered in China, the study of the history of penology remains a blank area. The author has conducted research and writing of great significance on the little-known state of penology under the integration of Chinese and Western culture and law. It provides an invaluable window for scholars in the field of Chinese law. — Professor Liu Zuoxiang, Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Dr. Guo Ming has collected as much material as possible with courage and enthusiasm, using modern theories and analytical frameworks to outline the tortuous process of the transformation and development of Chinese penology since the late Qing Dynasty. This is an effort to fill a gap in the field. — Professor Zhang Zhongqiu, Law School, China University of Political Science and Law
Modern Chinese penology was introduced from Japan in the late Qing Dynasty, coinciding with the process of Western law spreading to the East. As an important part of the reform movement of legal systems in modern China, the improvement of prison systems could not directly draw on effective knowledge resources from ancient Chinese legal traditions to meet the needs of reform. Therefore, the adoption and transplantation of Western penology became a reasonable path for the emergence of modern Chinese penology. In terms of the external influences on Chinese academia over the past century since the late Qing Dynasty, it is not entirely off the mark to say that Chinese penology has gone through three different stages: "learning from Japan," "learning from the Soviet Union," and "learning from the United States." This process reflects the shared intellectual fate of Chinese social sciences in the 20th century and has accumulated different academic experiences and lessons. As far as I know, although there have been some systematic research achievements on the "history of Chinese prison systems" in the field of legal history studies in China, there are still no specialized works focusing on the overall research object of the "history of Chinese penological studies."
Outline of the History of Chinese Prisons: Academic Discourse on Chinese Prisons since the Late Qing Dynasty
📌 Related Posts
Literature
2004 Multinational Corporations in China Report
2026-09-23
Literature
History of Human Thought Development: A Discussion on Ancient Near Eastern Speculative Thought
2026-09-27
Literature
Original image of the mountain villages in Qiandongnan
2026-09-26
Literature
Speak nicely
White-collar practical eloquence: White-collar practical eloquence
2026-09-20
Literature
Math - First Grade (Upper) (Beijing Normal University Edition) Elementary School Lesson Plan Link to the New Classroom
2026-09-29
Literature
East Asia and Harmony: An Interpretation of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism
2026-09-29
Literature
Railway Guerrillas Real Archives
2026-09-29
Literature
Chinese Language - First Grade (Upper Semester) (PEP Edition) Primary School Lesson Plan Link to the New Classroom
2026-09-29