Author: Na Silu
Publisher:
Publish Date: 2005-03-01
Features: Historiography is not a science, and law is not a science either, so contemporary legal historiography, which combines the two, is also not a science. It can be expressed in a syllogism: Historiography is not a science, law is a branch of historiography, therefore legal historiography is not a science. It is precisely because legal historiography is not a science that it is more important. However, it must be noted that the research in legal historiography still must employ scientific methods. Taking judicial trials as an example, when a court conducts a judicial trial, it must first determine the truth of civil and criminal cases, that is, it must first discover the factual truth of the case, before applying the law. Legal historiography is concerned with the factual truth of cases. Only by employing scientific methods to correctly discover the factual truth of cases, and then correctly applying the law, can fair and just judicial trials be achieved.
Qing Dynasty Central Judicial Appraisal System
📌 Related Posts
Literature
Chinese Confucian History: Pre-Qin Volume: Pre-Qin Volume
2026-09-27
Literature
"Women as Constructed: Contemporary Gender Theory"
2026-09-26
Literature
Money and Banking Tutorial
2026-09-25
Literature
Advanced Mathematics. I: Adult Undergraduate
2026-09-21
Literature
Japanese and puppet forces' plunder and control of the economy in the occupied areas of Central China
2026-09-28
Literature
Essence of Articles · New Knowledge of Encyclopedias(《Wen Cui Newspaper》20th Anniversary Celebration Series)
2026-09-28
Literature
Future 6 Trends
Network Economy and Opportunities in Asia
2026-09-28
Literature
Hotel Financial Accounting [Second Edition]
2026-09-28