Spirit of Chinese Philosophy

Author: Feng Youlan
Publisher:
Publishing Date: 2005-05-01
Features: A country without philosophy is like a magnificent temple without idols—it is hollow and superficial, lacking something to believe in and something to respect. The "Dao" discussed in this book is not the same as the "Dao" in New Logicism. The "Dao" in this book explains the "Dao" in New Logicism. The "Dao" in New Logicism is philosophy. Since this book explains the "Dao" in New Logicism, it is not a book about philosophy but a book that discusses philosophy. The purpose of writing this book is to describe the development of the mainstream of Chinese philosophy, criticize its strengths and weaknesses, and reveal the position of New Logicism in Chinese philosophy. Therefore, it first discusses the old school and then introduces the new tradition. When the similarities and differences are clear, the path of continuation becomes evident. Perhaps then, people will understand that the reason New Logicism is called "new" is not merely for show. In recent years, there have been new interpretations of the old school, and this book has been used to spread these ideas to the present. Thus, this book is not only a companion to New Logicism but also a supplement to the earlier work A History of Chinese Philosophy. The book consists of ten chapters, with one dedicated to the new tradition. I cherish it as a precious work, though it may be criticized. However, Confucius said: "Even after King Wen passed away, was not the literature not in my hands?" And Mencius said: "If the sages were to return, they would surely follow my words." With such confidence, even Laozi's followers, who were gentle and humble, said: "Those who truly understand me are rare, and those who value me are precious." How high they set their own expectations! The way of learning is to each their own insights. To compete for what is right is natural. When writing this book, I often discussed with Mr. Shen Gongwu Ding and Mr. Tang Xiyu Yongtong, Mr. He Zizhao Lin, who reviewed the manuscript and offered corrections.