Master and Margarita

Author: (Soviet Union) Bulgakov
Publisher:
Publication Date: 2004-06-01
Features: What kind of book is The Master and Margarita? Is it a bizarre novel that "maliciously satirizes the social reality of the 1920s and 1930s in the Soviet Union" and "advocates surrendering to evil forces and serving them"? Or is it a major masterpiece in contemporary Soviet literature that "inspires the goodness within people, purifies their souls," "helps people firmly grasp their moral compass," and celebrates "the bold pursuit of truth, goodness, and beauty"? Opinions are divided. Was the author Bulgakov an average writer who "did not understand the October Revolution of the proletariat" and "exposed his own humanistic weaknesses"? Or was he a profound thinker who "challenged all evil with fearless courage," a literary master who combined the talents of a satirist, a fantasy writer, and a realist? Why did he burn the original manuscript of this work, which he had spent two years writing up to the fifteenth chapter, and then pick up the pen again, spending twelve years and revising it eight times? In the face of his own awareness of his terminal illness, his impending death, his financial hardship, his heavy mental pressure, and the knowledge that this work would never be published, what force sustained him in revising and expanding it until the very end of his life? Now, at least it can be said that the verdicts some people rendered upon his death, calling him a "politically opposed novelist and an unserious humorist," and describing his works as "deliberately pleasing to readers" or "maliciously satirical," were too hasty. Restoring Bulgakov's reputation became a significant event in the Soviet literary world, and his works remained so popular in the 1980s—there must be an inherent reason for this. We should strive to explore his creative intentions through his thoughts, life, and creative path, and seek the source of his artistic charm and the answers to the aforementioned questions within the work itself.